I woke at dawn yesterday and worked out the penultimate scene of my novel. Before leaving for class at noon I managed to write about 1500 words, and suspect I’ll finish Ship of Souls this weekend. The day before I’d been mulling over a conversation I’d had with my agent; I intend to follow her sage advice, but was still disturbed by an editor who called Wish “unoriginal.” A comment like that from a book blogger would probably just roll off my back at this point, but when an “industry insider” makes such an assessment, there can be serious repercussions—based, in large part, on my response to the charge.
I’m teaching this course on neo-slave narratives—the same course to two different groups of students at two different schools. And that means I’m considering every text three times: once by myself as I prepare the lesson, then twice at my respective jobs. It’s interesting how the same text can reveal greater complexity each time you talk about it. I feel like I’ve read Frederick Douglass’ Narrative a hundred times, but this time around it seemed as though he was addressing racial dynamics in the publishing industry. Yesterday I had my students break into groups and look up Douglass’ references to black women, white women, black men, white men, Christians, and children. They found that Douglass made a point of exposing the utter vulnerability of black women, whereas white women were depicted as potential allies who inevitably succumbed to “the fatal poison of irresponsible power.” Sophia Auld begins to teach young Douglass to read, but is schooled by her husband on the dangers of creating an educated slave: “He would at once become unmanageable, and of no value to his master.” Douglass, of course, determines to read and write at any cost and does indeed become impossible to manage. He defies the man hired to “break” him and seizes his freedom by becoming a fugitive.
Now, eventually I’m going to show my students this image of Prince—I want to know how they feel about contemporary people using slavery as a metaphor. When a wealthy black artist stuck in an unfair contract with his (white-owned) record label writes the word “slave” on his cheek, what does that really mean? I have often objected to certain references to lynching—Clarence Thomas doesn’t deserve to invoke that traumatic history when he feels he’s being picked on by white senators who can (and did) grant him immense privilege and power. At the same time, I’m urging my students to consider the LEGACY of slavery—how else can we explain the continued fascination with the topic? Why do so many contemporary black writers choose to focus on the slave experience and the quest for freedom? Why do *I* write about slavery? To problematize the notion of progress, that’s why. This is NOT a post-racial society; slavery in the US was abolished in the 19th century, yet convicts continue to be exploited and people (mostly women and girls) are trafficked in this country and around the world at an alarming rate.
The horrific reality of enslavement diminishes any attempt made by contemporary individuals to position themselves as virtual slaves. Yet I still found myself marking this passage while reading Douglass’ narrative: “To all these complaints [made by the white slaveholder], no matter how unjust, the slave must answer never a word…a slave must stand, listen, and tremble.” I then thought of June Jordan’s essay, “The Difficult Miracle of Black Poetry,” in which she concludes that “America has long been tolerant of Black children, compared to its reception of independent Black men and Black women.”
…as long as we…remain the children of slavery, as long as we do not come of age and attempt, then to speak the truth of our difficult maturity in an alien place, then we will be beloved, and sheltered, and published.
But not otherwise. And yet we persist.
I’m going to finish Ship of Souls this weekend. I’m going to send it to my agent and hope that she can find an extraordinary editor who’s not afraid of dealing with a black author who is determined to be “unmanageable.”

Wow really? ‘Wish’ seems to have a history of similar literature that it connects to (Octavia Butler I think you’ve said before), but so do a billion other books and that’s called ‘following a great tradition’. It’s also not like time travel books, featuring young people forced into slavery, is some kind of mega sub-genre. I’m really suspicious of call for originality in general (because there are so many different areas you can look for originality in and it seems as if many people look at books in a partial way and use the cry of unoriginality to obscure the originality of other parts if that makes sense) and having read Neesha Meminger’s post the other day I’ve now had my eyes opened to the racial double standards that operate in talks about originality.
Thanks for the support, Jodie. “Unoriginal” is definitely the all-purpose dismissal used by editors–along with “unmarketable”–and both really mean, “I don’t want to deal with you.” I don’t think this is about my work at all–it’s about my personality rubbing a powerful person the wrong way. I’m an uppity negress!
I was in a classroom of about 15 black high schoolers the other day and not one of them could tell me who Malcolm X was. My first realization was that they were born AFTER Spike Lee’s biopic–but even so, just a few months or a couple of years shy of starting college, they were never given this important glimpse into their history. How come high brow literature that piggy backs off nineteenth century narratives by Jane Austen and vampires, and fairies, and dragon slaying quests can be perpetuated and not paranormal story about slavery? If you are the only one writing such a story, what’s not original about that? Jeebus! Keep on, keepin’ on and know that your stories breathe.
Thanks, Ibi. We certainly can’t wait for the white establishment to give a damn about what our kids know or don’t know…we’re on the front lines, meeting kids where they are, helping them to be aware of the gaps in their education. I think teaching preserves my sanity, truly, b/c I can SEE the change occurring. WE know what kids need b/c we care enough to listen and find out. Too bad the industry isn’t as concerned.
Go, Zetta, go!
I’m going to send it to my agent and hope that she can find an extraordinary editor who’s not afraid of dealing with a black author who is determined to be “unmanageable.”
Damn straight.
Thanks, Shveta! ALL our stories will live in the world some day…
What an amazing post, just amazing. I think we the living are telling these stories because our ancestors had to be silent for so long. We tell their stories because they could not. And I believe they are picky about who the chose to tell them.
May we all learn to be unmanageable. My book is seeing the light of day only because I found a publisher who didn’t need to break me as a writer or my story. I love the concept behind your Ship of Souls, you may have to wait awhile ( or maybe not let us hope.) but someone is going to see how wonderful it is because the world need the story.
Karen
[...] did have a moment last month, however, when I wondered whether some women in publishing have learned too well from their more powerful male colleagues. Whatever happened to “Lifting as We Climb”? Of [...]